There seems to be a few misconceptions regarding full-Kelly wagering:
Let’s back up a bit. Last week I began tracking the Massey-Peabody bowl picks:
When I alerted them to this, a spirited Twitter discussion on the merits of full-Kelly wagering broke out. Some highlights:
Cade was swiftly informed that his hypothesis was in fact, false:
Data Niner shared his thoughts from the trenches. Diggs was gracious.
Lou dropped the truth:
More truth from Lou:
Rufus suggested that the magnitude of the disagreement isn’t key, so long as the direction is correct. In short, he just has to be “on the right side.” Plus EV clarified:
Diggs broke things down:
Diggs was on point:
Rufus offered this all-timer:
So, now would be a good time for me to make one point clear:
The problem isn’t the Kelly-Criterion.
PFF isn’t getting their asses handed to them in my tracking due to the Kelly-Criterion:
|% of Bankroll||-393.10%|
Same with Ed Feng:
|% of Bankroll||-161.20%|
The problem is their numbers are absolute garbage. If your internal numbers say you have a 75% edge vs. a highly liquid market, your numbers are wrong. If you think an underdog should be favored by a touchdown, you’re missing something:
Regressing to market will lower the magnitude of the error, but it will not remove its existence. If you don’t want to get your pecker caught in Chesterton’s Fence, it behooves you to figure out what you are missing and incorporate that into your model. In short, if your numbers are regularly largely off market, don’t fucking bet them.
There’s another issue in terms of what you believe in regards to your numbers. There’s nothing wrong with regressing to market. The market is the collective wisdom of profit-seeking agents. It’s not perfect, and it’s not unbeatable. It’s just better than anything else publicly available.
I began my tracking career with the Vampire Squid itself, Goldman Sach 2014 World Cup projections. I opened with this art commission:
That’s “Snorting Bullshit” from Penelope Love.
Don’t believe your own bullshit. Don’t believe anyone else’s bullshit either. Heck, my best gambling advice is very simple: Don’t bet.
But also, don’t blame the Kelly-Criterion. If I think I have a 3.45% edge at even money, I’ll risk 6.9% of my bankroll. If you are going quarter-Kelly, in practice that means you really believe your edge is 0.8625%. Accept that as your internal reality.
TLDR, Norm sums it up perfectly:
Oh, and go Broncos: